AfroLA logo

A multi-part investigation into the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power's presence in the Eastern Sierra, and its impact. READ MORE →

How LA’s ‘local’ water politics ensnare residents—300 miles away

By Katie Licari
Landscape of hills and sparse snow with rain coming through the clouds.
The White Mountains peek through rain and snow pouring over the Paiute’s sacred Volcanic Tablelands, the northernmost edge of the Owens Valley, on Feb. 17, 2024. Dana Amihere/AfroLA

This article is reported by AfroLA and co-published by AfroLA, Guardian US and Inyo County's The Sheet The Sheet. It’s the first of several stories examining the impact of Los Angeles’s extensive landownership in the Owens Valley.

A red horse statue perched on a 12-foot pole greets drivers coming to the town of Bishop from the south. It’s one of the first landmarks here, part of Mike Allen’s corrugated metal feed store — a local institution that sells camping gear, livestock feed and moving equipment in this expansive region of inland California.

But Allen desperately wants to sell it so he can retire.

“I own the building, the inventory, and the asphalt for the parking lot,” Allen said. “But I don’t own the land under it.”

And so Allen can’t get rid of it.

A man with a white beard, red flannel shirt and ball cap stands outside a wooden building.
Owner Mike Allen stands outside his popular Bishop feed store on Feb. 18, 2024. Katie Licari/AfroLA

The land under Allen’s store belongs to an owner 300 miles away: the city of Los Angeles, specifically its Department of Water and Power (DWP).

LA has owned large swathes of the Owens Valley, where Bishop is located, for more than a century. The city first swooped in in the early 1900s, at the dawn of California’s water wars. As the metropolis grew at breakneck speed, its leaders searched for ways to sustain that population, and when they entered the Owens Valley, they found what LA lacked: plenty of water.

Over the next decades, LA agents secretly, and aggressively, worked to buy up Owens Valley land and take ownership of the water rights that came with those parcels. By 1933, DWP had gobbled up the large majority of all properties in the towns of Bishop, Big Pine, Independence and Lone Pine.1

Today, DWP owns 90% of privately-available land in Inyo County, which encompasses the Owens Valley, and 30% of all the land in neighboring Mono County. Aqueducts transporting water from both counties provided 395,000 acre-feet of water2 to LA last year – about 73% of the city’s water supply.3

Black and white photo of the grassy banks of the Owens River before construction of the second Los Angeles Aqueduct in 1968.
Owens River before construction of the second Los Angeles Aqueduct in 1968. (Credit: US Library of Congress)

Stories of LA’s brazen land grab in the Owens Valley have been told for decades – it was loosely depicted in the 1974 blockbuster Chinatown. And the fierce legal battles that have ensued, including over the environmental impact, have made regional headlines for years.

But residents, business owners, and some municipal leaders in this rural region say LA’s landownership in the valley has taken on a new, and crippling, dimension in recent years.

DWP has taken steps to exert even greater control over its land holdings in the valley.

An AfroLA review of hundreds of documents obtained through records requests, as well as interviews with municipal officials, residents, legal experts, and business owners reveals DWP started changing the terms of leases in 2015, and formally added restrictions on the transfer of leases from one owner to the next in 2016.4

DWP’s moves have meant that hundreds of families who have lived and built lives in the Eastern Sierra have seen their plans upended, often being left with the stark choice of abandoning their livelihoods or fighting DWP.

A small town downtown street with cars driving and mountains in the background.
The snow-capped White Mountains rise behind Line Street in downtown Bishop on Feb. 17, 2024. Dana Amihere/AfroLA

For Mike Allen, owner of the feed store, the 2016 changes mean that he can’t retire to Montana, where his wife moved seven years ago.

Selling the store had always been Allen’s retirement plan. But since the new owner will not be able to transfer their lease or sell the business to recoup their investment, he hasn’t found a buyer. Meanwhile, his own lease has gone into holdover status, where he continues to pay his rent and abides by the terms of his lease, but he can be evicted at will with 30 days notice.

Leases lapsing into holdover status have long been an issue, but between 2015 and 2023 more leases have gone into holdover than before.5

Allen now faces a brutal choice: continue to make month-to-month payments on an inactive lease, or surrender the building to DWP and abandon his business. If he lets the lease go back to DWP, he has to liquidate all of his inventory and demolish all of the improvements he has invested in over the years — including the asphalt in the parking lot and the building itself.6 That’s just a standard clause in DWP leases.7

Since DWP implemented the changes, at least 13% of leases in Inyo County reverted back to DWP control, an analysis of property tax records reveals.

Los Angeles is not alone in importing water from hundreds of miles away. San Francisco obtains most of its water from the Hetch Hetchy reservoir and water system in Yosemite, and the California State Water Project gets most of its water from rural areas in Northern California. LA’s also not the only city that secures its water supply through land holdings – New York City has similar landlord-tenant relationships. But DWP in the Owens Valley is the “poster child” for negatively impacting the broader local economy, according to Greg James, special counsel for Inyo County.

A private property sign on a fence containing some undeveloped land.
City of Los Angeles property located in northwest Bishop. Dana Amihere/AfroLA

As water becomes increasingly scarce in a more extreme climate, urban communities like Los Angeles will increasingly need to rely on imported water, obtained at the expense of the environment and economies of rural and Indigenous communities. Los Angeles claims to be working toward diversifying its water portfolio through stormwater capture, recycled water and conservation as well as importing water from the Colorado River Basin and Northern California. But even after conservation efforts, LA projects it still needs to get about 30% of its water from the Owens Valley by 2045 meaning the city and the valley are locked in a relationship for the foreseeable future.8

Los Angeles DWP did not respond to a detailed request for comment from AfroLA. DWP’s Eastern Sierra division also did not respond to a detailed request for comment.

The land of flowing water

Inyo County is a land of extremes. The region is larger than the state of Vermont but fewer than 20,000 people call it home. In its west, the peaks of the Eastern Sierra tower 10,000 feet high above the Owens Valley. In its south lie the desert landscapes of Death Valley. Brave hikers can trek from Mt. Whitney, the highest point in the continental US, to Badwater Basin in Death Valley, the lowest point in the US.

During winter, the Owens Valley ground is parched. But come spring, when snowmelt runs from the Sierra and White Mountains down to the Owens River, the valley turns lush green. The Paiute, who have lived in the valley for thousands of years, named it Payahuunadü, the Land of Flowing Water.

Map image

The State Water Project provides water from the sparsely populated parts of Northern California to the more populous south.

The Colorado River Aqueduct provides water to seven western states, including California, and Mexico.

And the Los Angeles aqueducts transport water from Inyo and Mono counties solely to the city of LA.

Los Angeles's water starts out as snowpack of the Eastern Sierra mountains. Water that melts to the west becomes part of the State Water Project and supplies all of Southern California.

Water that melts east of the Sierra Nevada runs off into the Owens Valley and into the Los Angeles Aqueduct for use by LA city residents.

Water runs off via streams into alpine lakes in Inyo and Mono counties and eventually drains into the Owens River Basin.

From the Upper Owens River, the majority of the water is diverted into the first Los Angeles aqueduct and about 20,000 acre feet – enough water for around 200,000 Angelenos for a year – is diverted to the Lower Owens River.

The Lower Owens River runs to the Owens Lake bed—drained by the first major LA aqueduct—in Keeler where it is pumped back into the Los Angeles Aqueduct.

The second aqueduct, built in the 1970s, pumps groundwater from the valley floor. It starts south of the Haiwee Reservoir just south of the turnoff for Death Valley National Park.

Both aqueducts run south through Inyo County, into Kern County and then into L.A. County. You can most easily catch a glimpse near the intersection of Interstate 5 and State Route 14.

William Mulholland, LA’s famed water and infrastructure czar, realized the valley’s potential when he camped in the area in 1904. LA agents soon went on a buying spree, locking in land and water holdings.

In the late thirties, the city briefly authorized the sale of about half of Bishop’s properties back into private ownership, but by the mid-forties DWP had stopped that practice. Between 1967 and today, DWP added 10,000 more acres to its holdings in the valley.9

Today, LA owns 252,00010 of the county’s 6.5 million acres.11 The federal government, which owns the land for Death Valley National Park and Inyo National Forest, holds much of the rest.12

DWP’s extensive holdings make it the de facto landlord for many of Inyo County’s residents. The department leases the majority of the region back to those living there – to the county government, to ranchers, to veterinarians and retailers, to families who’ve lived here for generations and people compelled to move in because of its stunning outdoors.

Living here had long been affordable, too. LA’s leases were inexpensive, and for decades, the lease process was simple and straightforward, valley residents said. Much like the way many mobile home parks operate, property owners own the structures of their homes and businesses, but not the land underneath. DWP leases them that land through agreements with fixed terms, at fixed rates. Lease holders pay either month-to-month or on a yearly basis. When a lessee previously sold their home or business, the lease for the property transferred to the new owner after a credit score check, lease holders recalled. Lease transfers were hardly ever rejected, they said.

That changed in 2016. That year, DWP ruled13 the way it had been handling leases conflicted with the 1924 Los Angeles City Charter, which outlaws the sale or lease of city property except at public auction. From then on, DWP only allowed leases to be transferred once. That meant an existing tenant could pass on their lease, but the new tenant could not, and instead would have to let the land revert back to LA control.

If leases go out to bid, DWP auctions the lease off to the highest bidder. Under the old system, the lessee was able to profit directly from the sale of their business. Now, DWP reaps the financial benefits of the auction.

DWP retroactively applied this policy to leases established before 2016. For lessees, like Mike Allen who have leased for decades, it devalued their businesses and made them difficult to sell, because a new owner has no guarantee to recoup their costs.

The department carved out an exemption for families, allowing leases to transfer within a family an unlimited number of times.

“For 100 years they’ve never cared,” said Mark Lacey, a Lone Pine resident and rancher who sits on the Owens Valley Committee, a nonprofit that helped negotiate environmental mitigations in a water agreement between LA and the county. “Now all of a sudden, you know, somebody decided, well, we're going to actually follow the letter of the law based on the LA City Charter that says, you know, we can't do this. We have to put [leases] out to bid.”

Many lessees often only learned of the changes when they went to renew their lease, or tried to transfer it.

The White Mountains overlook the new Bishop Veterinary Hospital in northeast Bishop near Route 6.
The White Mountains, home to the oldest trees on earth, overlook the new Bishop Veterinary Hospital located in northeast Bishop near Route 6. Dana Amihere/AfroLA

Tom Talbot was the valley’s veterinarian for more than 45 years. Talbot owned Bishop Veterinary Hospital, a yellow cottage on the north side of Bishop near the intersection of Route 395 and Route 6. It’s the only full-service vet practice for hundreds of miles in every direction.

In 2015, Talbot wanted to retire from medicine while still healthy enough to ranch full time. But when he went to sell the hospital and transfer his lease, he said, he found completely rewritten rules.

Talbot had hoped his son-in-law Taylor Ludwick and Nicole Milici, who had volunteered working at the clinic since she was a teenager, would jointly take over the business.

But the new transfer policy meant Milici could not be put on the lease. As a relative, Ludwick could. “We’re 50% partners in the business,” said Ludwick. “But it’s all me on the lease.”

The lease structure forced Ludwick to take on more risk, in regards to being at the mercy of changes to his lease terms. But it was just the start of the veterinarians' problems.

“It's just a giant handcuff that completely stymies any possibility of growth, equity, business advancement, because you don't have anything real to sell,” Ludwick said.

Ludwick’s lease has been expired for years, and DWP hasn’t renewed it, meaning it is in holdover status. Without a lease active for the long run, it’s been hard to secure funds for repairs and improvements, he said.

The yellow and brick building that houses the clinic is 60 years old and “rotting out from under us,” said Ludwick.

After Talbot transferred his lease to Ludwick, lease policies changed again. Starting in 2016, the family transfer policy was limited to transfers between parents and children, grandparents and grandchildren, and between spouses. As Talbot's son-in-law, Ludwick would never have been able to take over the lease.

Ludwick and Milici recently purchased an out of business Ford dealership on some rare non-DWP owned private land. They built a brand new veterinary hospital on the land and they plan to use their current lease to provide specialty care like physical therapy services.

“The good news is we got something that is ours,” said Ludwick, “It gives us freedom.”

Sporting goods store owner Reagan Slee went through a different set of disappointments.

In 2019, DWP changed their stance on selling properties to lessees.14 The new policy allows some business owners15 the chance to purchase the land they are leasing. Slee’s store, filled with hunting and fishing gear, was at the top of that list.

Appraisers appraised, surveyors surveyed, and more than a year later Slee had a purchase agreement with the city of LA. That’s where progress stopped.

“The price was fair,” Slee said. He put money in the bank, then waited. More than 18 months have passed since Slee signed his purchase agreement.

“There was some excitement a year or two ago where we thought, ‘OK, this is finally going to happen,’” Slee said. “But now, I would be surprised if they called and said, ‘Hey, we’re ready to move forward.’”

Like what you're reading?

Sign up for The Breakdown, our biweekly(ish) newsletter.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Slee’s lease expired in 2017, so he, too, is in holdover status. It would take more than a year to draft a new lease in order to sell his business, he said.

Meanwhile, Slee struggles to upgrade or perform maintenance. “You’re invested in something that is unknown, that is not yours and then there is no date attached to it. The value of the business is worth almost nothing, because if I was to go sell, it can’t be transferred.”

According to Slee, DWP could keep the lease in holdover for 15 years, or it could pull the plug tomorrow. DWP did not respond to questions about Slee's case.

Since the transfer policies went into effect nearly a decade ago, approximately 20 leases have changed hands, according to AfroLA’s review of tax assessor data.

Meanwhile, at least 49 of DWP’s 354 leases and use permits in Inyo County have been removed from circulation and not put back out to bid. Use permits, which function similarly to leases, are “agreements for private use,” according to the aqueduct operations plan. These include people's backyards, pasture for horses and other uses.

Tamara Cohen, Inyo County’s former public health officer who served for 23 years, saw the use permit for her backyard return to DWP control. For years, she lived on a multi-home lot with two business partners, Kenney Scruggs and Bennet Kessler, and a shared 1.3 acre backyard. The homes and the land underneath them were in a trust, with Scruggs’s name on the DWP use permit for the backyard. When Scuggs died, the DWP agreement passed to Kessler. And when Kessler passed away, Cohen was ready to take it over in turn. Instead, a DWP real estate officer paid her a visit, and told her to vacate the yard within 60 days.

An empty, dusty backyard flanked by dead trees.
Dust and dead trees are what remain of Tamara Cohen's backyard after she had to remove her garden and deck when it reverted back to the control of Los Angeles DWP. Katie Licari/AfroLA
"If someone gets would be DWP's liability." Tamara Cohen
0:00 0:00
+ Read a transcript of this audio

We had a deck on the lease, that extended from up, you know, from our property line onto the deck. And I asked him if we could continue having that deck and using it. And he said, 'You know, risk management would never have it. If we don't maintain it and someone gets hurt or someone sitting on it and gets hit in the head by a branch, it would be DWP's liability.'

The rules had changed since 2013 when Kessler, an investigative reporter who spent her career monitoring DWP, took over the agreement, Cohen recalled the agent saying. Because the agreement was held in a trust, he said, it was taken out of circulation and would need to go to auction instead of being transferred.

The agent didn’t seem happy about the prospect of an auction either, Cohen recalled: “[He] was pretty clear with us that going for the bid process was just really a hassle for him to do,” said Cohen. “He said they [DWP] are trying to get rid of these kinds of [backyard] leases.”

Cohen was later given until the end of the original agreement, an additional 18 months, to clear out and vacate the land. This included ripping out a patio and Scuggs’s garden. Now there is nothing but dirt and locust trees. Last spring Cohen spent $7,000 to remove the dead vegetation on DWP’s property in order to prevent flooding and fires.

“It’s disconcerting. The trees have come down on what used to be leased land and it’s scary – it’s such a fuel for fires,” Cohen said, pointing to the dead locust trees that line the creek behind her home. “That used to be a lease that was maintained, and now it’s not. It’s a fire risk.”

The cost of drought

The circumstances LA found itself in when it applied the lease changes were similar to the ones it faced when it arrived in the Owens Valley more than a century ago: It was desperate for water.

If LA’s 200,000 residents were thirsty in 1904, today, the city has a daunting task of servicing 3.8 million people living in an ever-warming climate. Much of the southwest US has faced crippling drought conditions at various points in past decades, with states and cities competing for few resources.

DWP has also seen its operations in the Eastern Sierra curtailed. The origins of a trio of lawsuits settled between the late 80s to the early aughts are long and complicated. But, the outcome of the suits, initiated over rules around environmental protections, legally require DWP to leave hundreds of thousands of acre-feet of water in Inyo and Mono counties for the towns, people, Indigenous tribes, and wildlife of the region.

The drought lasting from 2011 to 2016 were the driest years ever recorded In 2014, internal DWP documents show, department staff recognized it needed to make changes to “prevent waste of water” in some of its most important leases: those of the Inyo County’s ranchers.16

The majority of acres leased by DWP in the Eastern Sierra are to ranchers, who graze their herds in the shadows of rugged Sierra Nevada mountains.

Ranchers and DWP have a “symbiotic relationship,” said Scott Kemp, whose family ranches more than 1,000 cattle on department land, one of the largest herds in the valley. “We take care of the land… people from Los Angeles can come up here and fish, and do what they do.”

A 2006 internal agency document describes the relationship as such: “The ranch lessees serve as stewards of the land and monitor and manage their leases consistent with LADWP’s goal of providing a reliable high quality water supply to Los Angeles. With the ranch leases providing this function, LADWP is able to concentrate its personnel on maintaining and operating water conveyances.”

Grass and bare trees line an irrigation ditch feeding into a creek.
Golden grass and bare trees line an irrigation ditch feeding into Bishop Creek in northwest Bishop. Dana Amihere/AfroLA

In 2014, amid the drought, DWP proposed to the ranchers to change lease terms to limit the amount of irrigation water in years of normal water supplies, allow DWP to provide water at their sole discretion in years with low snowmelt from the mountains, and place restrictions on water for cattle to drink. Inyo County’s water department responded that those changes could violate the 1991 water agreement between the county and DWP.

The proposed lease changes led to conversations between DWP and the trade group representing ranchers. Both parties agreed on restrictions for how water, particularly for cattle to drink, would be used. They also agreed that ranch lessees from then on could only transfer their lease once.17 The changes to lease terms were beneficial to DWP because they keep the proceeds from leases that are auctioned off instead of transferred.18

A year later, DWP attempted to cut water off from the ranch lessees a second time. In an April 27, 2015 letter DWP informed ranch lessees they would cut off their water supply in three days. According to a letter dated two days later, “Plainly stated, there is insufficient water to meet all water users’ needs.” Concerned community members and the county met with DWP. The solution? Diverting some water destined for Owens Lake, which helped keep toxic dust from the dry lakebed out of the air, to irrigation water for ranchers.19

Even though the transfer limits originated due to the ranchers, the department applied the policy broadly. On Nov. 15, 2016, commercial lessees and Inyo County supervisors grilled the aqueduct manager about the lease changes during a board meeting.

Supervisor Jeff Griffiths told the then-DWP aqueduct manager he hoped he and the City understood the repercussions of the one-time assignment policy on commercial lessees. “This could be the largest economic impact to the community since LA’s original acquiring of Owens Valley land,” said Griffiths.20

A man smiles for a portrait on the sidewalk with a street with two cars parked in the background.
Inyo County Supervisor Jeff Griffiths on the steps of the Bishop Civic Center on Feb. 19, 2024. Dana Amihere/AfroLA

A DWP memo on the origin of the one-time assignment policy that was included in emails between DWP real estate staff and the then-board president Mel Levine in 2016 only address ranch leases, and explains the changes were designed to bring the lease transfer process into compliance with the Los Angeles city charter and state law protecting DWP lessees in Inyo County. But reporting by AfroLA shows the one-time assignment policy and the family transfer policy are being applied to commercial leases and use permits, like Cohen’s backyard.

All together, the restrictions that have been imposed on how much water LA can pull out of Inyo county, either through negotiations with the county or the courts, have been extremely costly for the city.

Internal DWP documents indicate that DWP has spent $30-40 million annually buying water from southern California's Metropolitan Water District to offset the water it now leaves in Inyo for the ranchers.21 The water DWP has been required to provide to tribal communities, for environmental mitigation and for agriculture since the water agreements cost the agency at least $124 million annually, according to an internal briefing book.22

A way of life

Though long constructive, the relationship between DWP and some ranchers has been strained by years of drought and lease changes.

“DWP is nice to us in the wet years,” said Talbot, the former veterinarian, whose ranch is located in the picturesque Round Valley just north of Bishop.

Tom Talbot's cattle are herded for vaccinations for anthrax at his Round Valley Ranch. You can see the Sierra Nevada mountains including Mount Tom in the background and you can see two ranch hands on horses herding the cattle into a corral.
Tom Talbot's cattle are rounded up for vaccinations at his ranch in Round Valley on May 30, 2023. Katie Licari/AfroLA

In years water is plentiful, the department releases more water and provides flood control measures, Talbot said. But in dry years, DWP limits the ranchers’ water allocation to the minimum it is legally required to provide, he said.

Meanwhile, the cuts in neighboring Mono county have affected Inyo county ranchers, too – many of them have their herds graze in Mono in summer.

Mark Lacey said he had to look for pasture land as far away as Oregon and Nebraska when DWP cut water to Mono County in 2015.

“I got transportation costs going up and then coming back. And then I had to pay for that pasture while I was there, as well as everything I have from DWP,” he recalled. “The transportation costs were horrendous.”

Power our journalism.

Your support makes AfroLA's work possible.

“After 2016, I couldn't afford to do what I did. The price of cattle just didn't allow me to make those moves,” he said, “freight was too high, pasture elsewhere either wasn't available, or it was poor, [the price] was too high.”

Lacey has seen every single drought in the Owens Valley since the 70s. He said the 2011-16 drought was not as bad as the 1980s drought, but the impacts were more acute because of the water shutoffs.

For some in the county, the changes to the lease holders do not weigh up against the benefits of LA’s land ownership. County Supervisor Jen Roeser said the agency’s presence in Inyo has been critical to maintaining the rural lifestyle residents enjoy.

Roeser lives in a mobile home on a DWP lease she’s had for decades. “It's our whole lifestyle. And our purpose in life that we felt we were given was to operate a quality business in the mountains,” she said, one of her dogs napping in the shade of the black locust trees.

Roeser and her husband recently retired from running a mule packing business, which service tourists hiking deep into the Sierra backcountry and also serve as one of the only ways to fight fires high up in the Sierra Nevada mountains. Bishop’s home to a week-long mule rodeo, and Roeser is a mule rodeo champion.

Jen Roeser smiles from atop a horse at Mule Days 2023. She is wearing a white blouse and s straw hat.
Supervisor Jen Roeser leads a mule packing team at Bishop’s 2023 Mule Days, Inyo County’s biggest tourist event held each Memorial Day weekend. Katie Licari/AfroLA

“[We’ve] introduced families and tourists to amazing experiences that impacted their lives and gave them memories that last generations, and we hear from hundreds of people every year that have memories that are still with them from pack trips. And these leases make that possible,” said Roeser.

On the other side of the Sierra, Roeser explained, the lease rates of winter pasture land have grown increasingly expensive. DWP land, she said, is higher quality than alternatives.

DWP, she added, also stimulates local economies as the county's largest employer. They provide well-paying jobs – employing engineers and scientists and staff maintaining its infrastructure – with good benefits for local residents, including multigenerational families who live in the county but work for the city of Los Angeles, she said. In 2022, DWP’s payroll in the Owens Valley was approximately $60 million.23

As Los Angeles takes steps to diversify its water sources, the Eastern Sierra region will still make up a critical supply of the city’s water needs. For the Owens Valley that means a continuation of good jobs, but also the continued presence of a landlord 300 miles away making decisions about its residents’ livelihoods. While decisions, often behind closed doors, are made, lessees like Slee and Allen wait.

This investigation was supported with funding from the Data-Driven Reporting Project. The Data-Driven Reporting Project is funded by the Google News Initiative in partnership with Northwestern University | Medill.

The stories are the result of more than two years of records requests, interviews and data analysis by AfroLA. Guardian US provided assistance as a co-publishing partner in the editing, production and promotion of this story. Collaboration and co-publication with the Mammoth Sheet helped ensure that Owens valley residents have ready access to news that directly affects their lives and communities. Thank you to the many people who made reporting and sharing this story possible.

Are you an Owens Valley resident with a story to share? Have a tip regarding DWP? We want to hear from you. Visit our Contact page for details on how to call/text/message us. You can also email or leave an anonymous message on our online voicemail line.

  1. 2006 Real Estate Report, 1967 Real Estate Report
  2. Two acre-feet is the volume equivalent of one Olympic-sized swimming pool when full, or 2.5 million liters (660,000 gallons).
  3. Owens Valley Annual Operations Plan
  4. One-time assignment policy
  5. Allen is one of 198 leases in holdover as of 2023. Sixty-eight percent of the county's 306 leases are in holdover, up from 44% in 2015.
  6. Mike Allen's lease
  7. Surrender of Premises clause
  8. Urban Water Management Plan 2020 Report
  9. 1967 Real Estate Memo
  10. 2022 LA Aqueduct Briefing Book
  11. Inyo County GIS
  12. Geospatial analysis of landownership conducted by AfroLA
  13. The board voted to change the policy officially in 2016. Our reporting found efforts to change the lease transfer process started two years earlier when conversations began between the Cattlemen's Association, the trade group representing ranchers, DWP and the Los Angeles City Attorney's office. These conversations were staff-led and did not solicit the general public's comment. In addition, our reporting shows the application of these lease terms before the board took official action and applied to non-ranch leases.
  14. Under the old system if you wanted to purchase your property or obtain a lease longer than five years, you had to agree to bid for your lease at a public auction. This was considered a violation of the Charles Brown Act (a state law protecting Inyo County lessees of Los Angeles). Without a long lease or ownership it was impossible to obtain long term financing for the business. These longer lease terms were considered risky because you could lose your business to a higher bidder. In 2019, DWP changed their rules to allow for direct sales of land back to tenants but five years later nothing has happened.
  15. DWP documents obtained by AfroLA, including all letters sent to lessees leading up to the policy change.
  16. 2016 email correspondence between Mel Levine and DWP's Real Estate Office regarding an unnamed rancher who had complained to Levine about the assignment policy and wanted to know the timeline and the reasoning behind it.
  17. 2016 internal real estate memo email.
  18. 2014 county letter, 2016 internal real estate memo email.
  19. Inyo County Board of Supervisor Meeting Minutes April, 28 2015, April 29 2015 letter.
  20. Inyo County Board of Supervisor Nov. 15, 2016 meeting minutes
  21. 2016 internal real estate memo emails
  22. 2022 Aqueduct Briefing Book
  23. 2022 Aqueduct Briefing Book
Author image
Author Katie Licari
Katie Licari (she/her/hers) is a proud community college graduate and UC Berkeley alum who loves covering diverse communities and local political power in Southern California through a data-driven lens. When she is not coding, you can find her tending to her garden or reading with her cats.


For AfroLA
For Guardian US
  • Eline Gordts, Editor
  • Will Craft, Data editor
  • Andrew Witherspoon, Data editor
  • Thalía Juárez, Photo editor
  • Matt Cantor, Copy editor